Skip to main content
  • Berkeley Lab(link is external)
  • Energy Technologies Area(link is external)
Home
  • Join
  • About +
    • FAQs
    • Team Members
    • Partners
    • Participants
  • Resources +
    • Guidance Documents
    • Case Studies
    • Webinars
    • External Resources

Error message

There was a problem getting your available contact lists.

Bookending the Opportunity to Lower Wind’s LCOE by Reducing the Uncertainty Surrounding Annual Energy Production

Publication Type

Report

Date Published

06/2017

Author

Bolinger, Mark

Abstract

Reducing the performance risk surrounding a wind project can potentially lead to a lower weighted-average cost of capital (WACC), and hence a lower levelized cost of energy (LCOE), through an advantageous shift in capital structure, and possibly also a reduction in the cost of capital. Specifically, a reduction in performance risk will move the 1-year P99 annual energy production (AEP) estimate closer to the P50 AEP estimate, which in turn reduces the minimum debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) required by lenders, thereby allowing the project to be financed with a greater proportion of low-cost debt. In addition, a reduction in performance risk might also reduce the cost of one or more of the three sources of capital that are commonly used to finance wind projects: sponsor or cash equity, tax equity, and/or debt.

Preliminary internal LBNL analysis of the maximum possible LCOE reduction attainable from reducing the performance risk of a wind project found a potentially significant opportunity for LCOE reduction of ~$10/MWh, by reducing the P50 DSCR to its theoretical minimum value of 1.0 (Bolinger 2015b, 2014) and by reducing the cost of sponsor equity and debt by one-third to one-half each (Bolinger 2015a, 2015b). However, with FY17 funding from the U.S. Department of Energy's Atmosphere to Electrons (A2e) Performance Risk, Uncertainty, and Finance (PRUF) initiative, LBNL has been revisiting this "bookending" exercise in more depth, and now believes that its earlier preliminary assessment of the LCOE reduction opportunity was overstated. This reassessment is based on two new-found understandings: (1) Due to ever-present and largely irreducible inter-annual variability (IAV) in the wind resource, the minimum required DSCR cannot possibly fall to 1.0 (on a P50 basis), and (2) A reduction in AEP uncertainty will not necessarily lead to a reduction in the cost of capital, meaning that a shift in capital structure is perhaps the best that can be expected (perhaps along with a modest decline in the cost of cash equity as new investors enter the market).

Year of Publication

2017

Organization

Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Division, Energy Markets and Policy Department

Research Areas

Electricity Markets and Policy, Renewable Energy, Cost, Benefit, & Market Analysis, Cost, Benefit, and Market Analysis

Related Files

Report PDF (1.13 MB) (link is external)

        

©2025 Energy Technologies Area, Berkeley Lab
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (link is external)
  • twitter(link is external)
  • instagram(link is external)
  • LinkedIn(link is external)
  • facebook(link is external)
  • youtube(link is external)
  • DOE logo
  • UC logo
A U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory Managed by the University of California
Questions & Comments(link is external) Privacy & Security Notice(link is external)